It wasn't so much rain that hit FIFA in Switzerland on Wednesday, but a flood that Moses would have been proud of.
14 FIFA people were indicted by the US Department of Justice on charges that included multiple charges, including fraud and racketeering. Sports marketing executives who paid more than $150m in under-the-counter deals for media rights were given the indictment treated.
A lot of people wanted FIFA President Sepp Blatter to be one of the names on the DoJ's list, but it didn't happen. It's funny, because he's favourite to be re-elected as FIFA President on Friday - his fifth-straight victory for the post. Blatter has faced wave after wave of scandal - including the awarding of the 2022 World Cup to Qatar ahead of the USA (although he apparently voted for the US), but still managed to hold onto his Presidential post. Why? Frankly, because he's made FIFA an awful amount of money over the years, and there's nothing more than football federations want than the chinking of coins. And he's been around a long time, so he knows how to talk to biggest names in FIFA's fiefdom: The sponsors.
A lot of people wanted FIFA President Sepp Blatter to be one of the names on the DoJ's list, but it didn't happen. It's funny, because he's favourite to be re-elected as FIFA President on Friday - his fifth-straight victory for the post. Blatter has faced wave after wave of scandal - including the awarding of the 2022 World Cup to Qatar ahead of the USA (although he apparently voted for the US), but still managed to hold onto his Presidential post. Why? Frankly, because he's made FIFA an awful amount of money over the years, and there's nothing more than football federations want than the chinking of coins. And he's been around a long time, so he knows how to talk to biggest names in FIFA's fiefdom: The sponsors.
Of course, this has led the bigger scream: What will happen to the relationship with the sponsors?
The 2014 World Cup's premier partners were Adidas, Coca-Cola, Hyundai, Emirates, Sony and Visa, with other sponsors including Budweiser, McDonald's, Castrol, and Johnson & Johnson, to name but a few.
You can be sure that every single one of them - who pays around $10-25m to be a FIFA partnership (according to Sponsorship.com), probably called Blatter to ask what in Pele's name was going on. After all, being a partner collectively cost a total of $1.6bn for the 2014 World Cup - and that isn't cheap (although you could say that the exposure to the billions of people watching the games on their TV, computer and mobile screens was worth the money).
You can be sure that every single one of them - who pays around $10-25m to be a FIFA partnership (according to Sponsorship.com), probably called Blatter to ask what in Pele's name was going on. After all, being a partner collectively cost a total of $1.6bn for the 2014 World Cup - and that isn't cheap (although you could say that the exposure to the billions of people watching the games on their TV, computer and mobile screens was worth the money).
A lot of people looking at Sepp Blatter and the current situation want Blatter out. But it hasn't come from the sponsors.
The sponsors COULD throw their toys out of the pram, and demand Sepp Blatter's resignation or they cancel their sponsorship deal. A highly-paid lawyer could call the indictments 'breach of contract' and they could walk. After all, big consumer companies don't like to be associated with corruption, for fear that consumers will walk away from them in protest. No company likes a worse indictment than the Department of Justice - an indictment by Twitter.
But the sponsors won't. After all, their continuing payments to FIFA keeps their competitors away.
The sponsors COULD throw their toys out of the pram, and demand Sepp Blatter's resignation or they cancel their sponsorship deal. A highly-paid lawyer could call the indictments 'breach of contract' and they could walk. After all, big consumer companies don't like to be associated with corruption, for fear that consumers will walk away from them in protest. No company likes a worse indictment than the Department of Justice - an indictment by Twitter.
But the sponsors won't. After all, their continuing payments to FIFA keeps their competitors away.
But they won't. Does Adidas really want to give up their sponsorship contract? You can guarantee that Nike - who does perfectly well out of making kits during World Cups as it is - wouldn't mind putting their toe into the ring to get even more World Cup exposure. Nor would Under Armour. Coca-Cola? Pepsi - already associated with the Super Bowl - would grab the chance to sponsor the event. Plus, they can sell a lot of Pepsi at football games. Continental Tires? Goodyear. Johnson & Johnson? Pfizer. McDonald's? Subway. Visa? Mastercard (or American Express). The list goes on.
The most likely sponsor to walk out would be McDonald's. McDonald's has had scandals worldwide over the last few years, which has hugely impacted the company. And now things are going so badly in the USA that it's no longer reporting monthly sales data. New CEO Steve Easterbrook may well want to reduce spending - and the chance of being 'guilty by association' - by cutting the relationship. That is, if Easterbrook doesn't consider the World Cup far too big a marketing opportunity.
And the TV partners? No sane media organisation is going to turn down the monster ratings and the potential earnings that come from advertising revenues just because of a scandal.
The sponsors have said that they are worried about a scandal....but they aren't leaving yet (thanks for the headline, CNN Money!).
And we don't think they will be anytime soon.
And we don't think they will be anytime soon.


